T-TIP against the wall: feasibility, resistance, and consequences for third countries

Ana Paula Tostes

Resumo


The objective of the article is to analyze the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) as a new model of international agreements, the reasons for resistance and the consequences for third countries that are dependent on trade with the United States and the European Union (EU). Special attention is given to the relationship between Brazil and the EU in the context of this new trend of trade partnerships. Using a theoretical approach based on neoliberal institutionalism (KEOHANE, 2005; KEOHANE, NYE, 1989, 2002), the article presents a historical overview of the transatlantic negotiations and a critical analysis of the innovative aspects it brings. Even considering the potential unfeasibility of the T-TIP, it must be understood as part of a new generation of trade and investments (BALDWIN, 2011, 2008). Similar to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, the T-TIP aims to introduce a robust regulatory framework that would affect multilateralism. These “big treaties” include commitments that are not covered by the World Trade Organization and mandates that are not traditionally attributed to international institutions. Therefore, they bring to light new elements in international trends that are yet to be fully understood. 


Palavras-chave


T-TIP, international relations, European Union, United States, Brazil.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


AHEARN, Raymond J. Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Background and Analysis CRS Report RL34735, August, 2009. Available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34717.pdf. Accessed at: 10 sep. 2016.

ALESINA, Alberto; LA FERRARA, Eliana. Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Literature. vol. 43, n. 3, 2005, pp.762– 800.

AXELROD, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

BALDWIN, Richard. 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules. World Trade Organization: Economic Research and Statistic Division, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-08, 2011. Available at: https://www.wto.org/englisH/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf. Accessed at: 17 oct, 2016.

BALDWIN, Richard. The WTO tipping point, VoxEU.org, 1/7/2008. Available at: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1345. Accessed at: 17 oct. 2016.

BALLERA, Ricard. The TTIP or Europe. In: KHORANA, Sangeeta (ed.) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations between the EU and the USA. Caught between myth and reality? Barcelona: CIDOB, 2015, chap 3 pp. 37-47.

BARKER, Tyson, WORKMAN, Garrett. The Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Ambitious but Achievable. A stakeholder Survey and Three Scenarios. Washington DC, Atlantic Council/Bertelsmann Foundation.2013.

COMPA, Lance. Labor Rights and Labor Standards in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Negotiations: An American Perspective. In: SCHERRER, Christoph (Ed.) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Implications for labor. Munchen: Rainer Hampp Verlag, p. 120-136. Available at: https://www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/fileadmin/datas/einrichtungen/icdd/Publications/Volume5.pdf Accessed at: 10 sep. 2016.

COOPER, William. Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy. CRS Report for Congress, vol. 13, January, 2014, Available at: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33743.pdf. Accessed at: 1 aug. 2016.

CAPORASO, James. International relations theory and multilateralism: the search for foundations. International Organization. vol. 46, n. 3 Summer 1992.

ENGLISH PEOPLE. China climbs on human development index. 16 mar. 2013. Disponível em: .Acceded at: 10 mar. 2017.

FITCH RATINGS. China's Economic Rise Provides Mixed Benefits for Latin America. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=677239. Acceded at: 10 mar. 2017.

FITCH RATINGS. Website. Disponível em: http://www.fitchratings.com/web/en/dynamic/fitch-home.jsp. Acceded at: 1 fev. 2017.

FAWCETT, Louise; HURRELL, Andrew (Orgs.). Regionalism in World Politics - Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Fitch: China's Economic Rise Provides Mixed Benefits for Latin America, May, 9, 2012. Available at: http://newamericamedia.org/2011/01/latin-america-divided-over-ties-with-china-growing-suspicions-over-chinese-presence-in-latin-america.php. Accessed at: 10 sep. 2016.

FINAL REPORT HIGH LEVEL WORKING GROUP ON JOBS AND GROWTH

February, 2013. Available at: Http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150519.pdf. Accessed at: 10 sep. 2016.

FRANCK, D. S.. The legitimacy crisis in investment treaty arbitration: privatizing public international law through inconsistent decisions. Fordham Law Review. 2005, pp. 1521-1625.

GILL, Bates; MURPHY, Melissa. China-Europe Relations. Implications and Policy Responses for the United States. Center for Strategic & International Studies – CSIS. Washington DC, The CSIS Press, 2008.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Global Value Chains. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/global-value-chains.htm. Acceded at: 1 fev. 2017.

HORN, Henrik; MAVROIDIS, Petros C.; SAPIR, André. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. Brussels: Bruegel Blueprint Series vol. VII. 2009. Available at: http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/bp_trade_jan09.pdf. Accessed at: 21 nov. 2016.

KEOHANE, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

KEOHANE, Robert O.; NYE JR, Joseph. Power and interdependence: World Politics in Transition. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1989.

KEOHANE, Robert O.; NYE JR, Joseph. Power and Governance in a partially globalized world. London: Routledge, 2002.

KHORANA, Sangeeta (ed.) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)negotiations between the EU and the USA. Caught between myth and reality? Barcelona: CIDOB, 2015

MERKEL, Angela; OBAMA, Barack. The Future of Transatlantic Relations. WirtschaftsWoche. 2016. Available at: http://www.wiwo.de/politik/ausland/us-wahlen/usa-and-germany-the-future-of-transatlantic-relations/14853710.html. Accessed at: 21 nov. 2016.

MINISTÉRIO DAS RELAÇÕES EXTERIORES. Brasil e China no Reordenamento das Relações Internacionais: Desafios e Oportunidades. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre Gusmão, 2011.

PEREIRA, C.; NEVES, J. Brazil and China: South-South Partnership or North-South Competition? Policy Paper. Foreign Policy at Brookings, n. 26, March, 2011 Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/03_brazil_china_pereira.pdf. Accessed at: 1 dez. 2016.

RAZA, Werner; GRUMILLER, Jan; TAYLOR, Lance; TRÖSTER; ARNIM, Rudi von. An Economic Assessment of the Claimed Benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). In: SCHERRER, Christoph (Ed.) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Implications for labor. Munchen: Rainer Hampp Verlag, 2014. pp. 41-99 Available at: https://www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/fileadmin/datas/einrichtungen/icdd/Publications/Volume5.pdf. Acceded at: 10 sep. 2016.

REUTERS. Website. Disponível em: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/09/idUS194499+09-May-2012+BW20120509. Acceded at: 1 fev. 2017.

RODRIK, D. The War of Trade Models. Dani Rodrik’s webblog. Unconventional thoughts on economic development and globalization. 4 May 2015 Available at: http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2015/05/the-war-of-trade-models.html. Acceded at: 10 sep. 2016.

TOSTES, Ana Paula. The effect of the TTIP on the BRICS countries: the case of Brazil. In: ROY, Joaquín (Ed.) The New Atlantic Community: The European Union, The US and Latin America. Miami-Florida: European Union Center/Jean Monnet Chair, 2015.

RUGGIE, John Gerard. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization. vol. 46, n. 3, july 1992.

SCOTT CATO, Molly. I’ve seen the secrets of TTIP, and it is built for corporations not citizens. The Guardian. 2 feb. 2015. Available at: http:www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/04/secrets-ttip-corporations-

not-citizens-transatlantic-trade-deal. Acceded at: 10 sep. 2016.

STUDY ON “EU-US HIGH LEVEL WORKING GROUP FINAL REPORT.” (Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation). Ecorys, Rotterdam, October 2012. Available at: http://www.ecorys.nl/contents/uploads/factsheets/350_1.pdf. Accessed at: 1 aug. 2016.

THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE (official website), 2013 Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7w7OvujpkU. Accessed at: 30 mar. 2016.

TRANSATLANTIC TRADE & INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ADVISORY GROUP. Meeting Report. December 2014, Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/december/tradoc_152937.pdf. Accessed at: 10 sep. 2016.

UNDP Report 2008. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/268/hdr_20072008_en_complete.pdf. Acessed at: 1 dez. 2016




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21530/ci.v12n1.2017.590

Métricas do artigo

Carregando Métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia