HIERARQUIA SOB A ANARQUIA: POSSIBILIDADES ESTRATÉGICAS NO DILEMA DE SEGURANÇA PARA A SEMIPERIFERIA

Autores

  • Lucas de Oliveira Paes Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais - PPPGEEI/UFRGS
  • José Miguel Quedi Martins Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais - PPPGEEI/UFRGS

Palavras-chave:

Semiperiferia, Dilema de Segurança, Hierarquia, Anarquia, Teoria de Relações Internacionais

Resumo

Este trabalho problematiza o dilema de segurança para a Semiperiferia. A particularidade desse dilema para tais países é expressa por sua limitação na produção de respostas efetivas a ganhos de segurança alheios no nível sistêmico, dada sua restrição estática de recursos. Estuda-se como a especificidade social e funcional da Semiperiferia no sistema pode ser mais bem aproveitada em possibilidades estratégicas para além das previstas no dilema de segurança guiado pela anarquia. Busca-se ampliar a variabilidade comportamental do Realismo Estrutural, incorporando mecanismos interativos hierarquizados capazes mais bem de gerenciar a assimetria de recursos entre as unidades em meio à anarquia

Recebido em: 06 janeiro 2015
Aceito em: 13 julho 2015

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Lucas de Oliveira Paes, Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais - PPPGEEI/UFRGS

Graduado em Relações Internacionais pela UFRGS e mestrando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos
Internacionais da mesma universidade

José Miguel Quedi Martins, Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais - PPPGEEI/UFRGS

Professor adjunto do Departamento de Economia e Relações Internacionais da UFRGS

Referências

ALTER, Karen; MEUNIER, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, Nº 1, p. 13-24.

ARRIGHI, Givanni. 1998. A Ilusão do Desenvolvimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1998

BALDWIN, David. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

BRAUDEL, Fernand. 1985. A Dinâmica do Capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro, Rocco.

BROOKS, Stephen; WOHLFORTH, Willian. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy . New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

BENNET, Andrew. 2013. The mother of all isms: Causal mechanisms and structured pluralism in International Relations theory. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 19, Nº 3, p. 459-481.

BARNETT, Michael; DUVALL, Raymond. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization. Vol. 59, Nº 1, p. 39-75.

BURGES, Sean. 2008. Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. International Relations, Vol. 22, Nº.1, p. 64-85.

BURGES, Sean. (2013). Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers? International Affairs, Vol. 89, Nº 3, p. 577-594.

BUZAN, Barry; JONES, Charles; LITTLE, Richard. 1994. The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.

BUZAN, Barry; WAEVER, Ole. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

COX, Robert. 1983. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, Vol. 12, p. 162-175.

DESTRADI, Sandra. 2010. “Regional Powers and their strategies: empire, hegemony and leadership.” Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, Nº 4, p. 903-930.

DUNNE, Tim; HANSEN; WIGHT, Colin. 2013. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 19, Nº 3, p. 400-425.

ELMAN, Colin. 1996. Horses for Courses: Why not Neo-Realist Theories of Foreign Policy. Security Studies, Vol. 6, Nº 1, p. 7-53.

FAWCETT, Louise; HURRELL, Andrew. 1995. Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. New York: Oxford Press

.

FLEMES, Daniel. 2013. Network Powers: strategies of change in the multipolar system. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, Nº 6, p. 1016 – 1036.

FRAZIER, Derrick,; STEWART-INGERSOLL, Robert. 2010. Regional Powers and Security: a framework for understanding order within regional security complexes. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16, Nº 4, p. 731-753.

GALTUNG, Johan. 1976. Conflict on a Global Scale: Social Imperialism and Sub-Imperialism – Continuities in the Structural Theory of Imperialism. World Development, Vol. 4, Nº 3, p. 153-165.

GILPIN, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

GOLUB, Phillip. 2013. From the New International Economic Order to the G20: how the ‘global South’ is restructuring world capitalism from within. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, Nº 6, p. 1000 – 1015.

GRAMSCI, Antonio. 2006. Maquiavel. Notas sobre o Estado e a política. Cadernos do Cárcere: volume 3. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

HERZ, John. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, Vol. 2, Nº 2, p. 157–180.

HURRELL, Andrew. 2007. One World? Many Worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs, Vol. 83, Nº 1, p. 127-146.

HURRELL, Andrew. 2006. “Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers?.” International Affairs, Vol. 82, Nº 1, p. 1–19, 2006.

HURRELL, Andrew. 2013. “Narratives of emergence: Rising powers and the end of the Third World?” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 33, Nº 2, p. 203-221.

HURRELL, Andrew. 2000. Some Reflections on the Role of Intermediate Powers in International Institutions. Latin American Program Working Paper, Woodrow Wilson Center, Nº 244.

IKENBERRY, G. John. 2011. The Future of Liberal World Order. Foreing Affairs, may/june.

JERVIS, Robert. 1978. Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, Vol.30, Nº 2, p. 167-214.

KAHLER, Miles. 2013. Rising Powers and Global Governance: negotianting change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, Vol. 89, Nº 3, p. 711-729.

KATZENSTEIN, Peter; SIL, Rudra. 2008. Eclectic theorizing in the study and practice of International Relations. In: REUS-SMIT, Christian; SNIDAL, Duncan (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 109–130.

KEOHANE, Robert; MARTIN, Lisa. 2003. Institutional Theory as Research Program. In: ELMAN, C; ELMAN, M. (Eds.) Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

KELLY, Robert. 2007. Security Theory in the ‘New Regionalism’. International Studies Review, Vol. 9, Nº 2, p. 197-229.

KEOHANE, Robert. 1969. Lilliputian’s Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics, International Organization, Vol. 23, Nº 2, p. 291-310.

KEOHANE, R. et al. 1986. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

KEOHANE, Robert; NYE, Joseph. 1987. Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization, Vol. 41, Nº 4, p. 725-753.

KINDLEBERGER, Charles. 1973. The world in depression, 1929-39. Berkeley: University of California Press.

KRASNER, Stephen. 1976. State Power and Structure of International Trade. World Politics, Cambridge, Vol. 28, Nº 3, p. 322-336.

KRASNER, Stephen. 1983. Transforming International Regimes: What the Third World Wants and Why. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, Nº 1, p. 119-48.

KRASNER, Stephen. 1982. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, Vol. 36, Nº 2, p. 185-205.

LAKE, David 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organizations, Vol. 50, Nº 1, p. 1-33.

LAKE, David. 2001. Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions. International Security, Vol. 26, Nº 1, p. 129-160.

LAKE, David. 2007. Escape from the State of Nature. Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics, International Security, Vol.32, Nº1, p. 47–79.

LAKE, David. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, Nº 4, p. 459 489.

LAKE, David. 2009. Regional hierarchy: authority and local international order. Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, Nº 1, p. 35-58.

LAKE, David. 2011. Why ‘isms’ are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 55, Nº 2, p. 465–480.

LAKE; David; MORGAN, Patrick. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. Philadelphia: PennState University Press.

LAVOZCKA, Alexander. 2013. Beyond consent and coercion: using republican political theory to understand international hierarchies. International Theory, Vol. 5, Nº 3, p. 385-413.

LIMA, Maria Regina S. 2013. The Political Economy of Brazilian Foreign Policy: Nuclear Energy, Trade and Itaipu. Brasília: Funag.

LOBO-FERNANDES, Luís. 2007. From Thucydides to Guicciardini, Permanent factors of Realism and the rise of the new Asian powers. Relações Internacionais, Vol. 16, p. 05-17.

LUCE, Matias. 2011. A teoria do subimperialismo em Ruy Mauro Marini: contradições do capitalismo dependente e a questão do padrão de reprodução do capital: a história de uma categoria. Tese de Doutorado. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

MARTIN, Lisa; SIMMONS, Beth. 2001. International Organizations and Institutions . In: CARLSNAES, W; KISSE, C; SIMMONS, B. (Eds.) Handbook of International Relations. New York: Sage.

MEARSHEIMER, John. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, Vol. 13, Nº 3, p. 5-49.

MEARSHEIMER, John. 2001. Tragedy of Great Powers Politics. London and New York: Norton.

MITTELMAN, James. 2013. Global Bricolage: emerging market powers and polycentric governance. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, Nº1, 2013.

NARLIKAR, Amrita. 2007. All that Glitter is not Gold: India’s rise to power. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25, Nº5, 983-996.

NARLIKAR, Amrita. 2013. Negotiating the rise of new powers. International Affairs, Vol. 89, Nº 3, p. 561-576.

NOLTE, Deltlef. 2010. How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, Cambridge, Vol.36, Nº4, p.881-901.

PAPE, Robert. 2005. Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security, Vol.30, Nº 1, p. 7-45.

PAUL, Thaza V. 2005. Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy. International Security, Vol.30, Nº 1, p. 47-71.7

PEDERSEN, Thomas. 2002. Cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration. Vol. 28, Nº 4, p. 677-696.

POSEN, Barry. 2003. Command of Commons: the military foundation of U.S. hegemony. International Security, Vol. 28, Nº 1, summer.

POSEN, Barry. 2014. Restraint: a New Foundation for U.S. Grande Strategy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

REUS-SMIT, Christian. 2013. Beyond Metatheory? European Journal of International Relations, Vol.19, Nº 3, p. 598-608.

RODRIGUEZ, Julio Cesar. 2012. Cordeiros ou Chacais? O Brasil frente aos desafios e oportunidades do sistema internacional. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, Vol.55, Nº 2, p. 70-89.

RUGGIE, John G. 1983. Contituity and Transformation in World Polity: Toward a New Realist Sinthesis. World Politics, Vol. 35, Nº 2, p. 261-285.

SCHWELLER, Randall. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Securtity, Vol. 19, Nº 1, p. 72-107.

SCHWELLER, Randall. 1996. Neorealism's status‐quo bias: What security dilemma? Security Studies, Vol. 5, Nº 3, p. 90-121.

SCHWELLER, Randall. 2010. The logic and illogic of the security dilemma and contemporary realism: a response to Wagner’s critiques. International Theory, Vol. 2, Nº2, p. 288-305.

SCHIRM, Stephan. 2010. Leaders in need of followers: emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16, Nº 2, p. 197-221.

SIDHU, Pal; MATHA, Paratap; JONES, Bruce. 2013. Shaping the Emerging World. Washington, Brooking Institute Press.

TILLY, Charles. 2005. Indenties, Boundaries and Social Ties. Boulder and London: Paradigm.

TILLY, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Camabridge University Press.

WAEVER, Ole. 1996. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: SMITH, Steve; BOOTH, Ken; ZALEWSKI, Marysia (eds). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 149–185.

WAGNER, Robert. 2007. War and The State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

WALT, Stephen. 1990. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

WALT, Stephen; MEARSHEIMER, John. 2013. Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, Vol.19, Nº 3, p. 427-457.

WALTZ, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Berkeley: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

WALTZ, Kenneth. 2001. Men, The State and War: A Theoretical Analisis. New York: Columbia University Press.

WENDT, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

SNIDAL, Duncan; WENDT, Alexander. 2009. Where is the International Theory now? International Theory, Vol. 1, Nº 1, p. 1-14.

WENDT, Alexander; FRIEDHEIM, Daniel. 1995. Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State. International Organization, Vol. 49, Nº 4, p. 689-721.

IKENBERRY, G. John; MATSANDUNO, Michael; WOHLFORTH, Willian (Eds). 2011. International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

YOUNG, Oran. 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, Vol. 45, Nº 3, p. 281-308.

Downloads

Publicado

2014-12-01

Como Citar

Paes, L. de O., & Martins, J. M. Q. (2014). HIERARQUIA SOB A ANARQUIA: POSSIBILIDADES ESTRATÉGICAS NO DILEMA DE SEGURANÇA PARA A SEMIPERIFERIA. Carta Internacional, 9(2), 72–95. Recuperado de https://cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/191

Edição

v. 9 n. 2 (2014)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  • Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  • Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.