Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
1-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
• This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original author and source are credited.
• Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que
permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.
Copyright:
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE
RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS
ISSN 2526-9038
What does it mean to be an
African person? Racialized identity
and citizenship policies for the
Sixth Region of Africa1
O que significa ser uma pessoa africana?
Políticas racializadas de identidade e cidadania
para a Sexta Região da África
¿Qué significa ser una persona africana?
Políticas racializadas de identidad y ciudadanía
para la Sexta Región de África
DOI: 10.21530/ci.v18n3.2023.1352
Bas’Ilele Malomalo2
Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno3
Marrielle Maia4
1 This work was carried out with the support of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education
Personnel – Brazil (CAPES) – Financing Code 001.
2 Doutor em Sociologia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio Mesquista/UNESP. Professor de graduação
nos cursos das Relações Internacionais, Ciências sociais, Mestrado Interdisciplinar em Humanidades (MIH)
do Instituto de Humanidades e Letras (IHL) da Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia
Afro-Brasileira (UNILAB). (escolaafricana@gmail.com), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-3385.
3 Mestranda em Relações Internacionais pelo Instituto de Economia e Relações Internacionais da Universidade
Federal de Uberlândia (IERI – UFU). (lucia.toledobueno@gmail.com). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-
4167-3274.
4 Doutora em Ciência Política pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas. professora nos cursos de graduação
e de pós-graduação em Relações Internacionais no Instituto de Economia e Relações Internacionais da
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (IERI-UFU). (marriellemaf@gmail.com). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0001-6857-6688.
Artigo submetido em 06/06/2023 e aprovado em 23/05/2024.
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
2-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
Abstract
With the Declaration by the African Union of the Diaspora as the Sixth Region of the
continent – a centenary demand of activists and intellectuals – debates resurface
around the African identity. It aims to explain via African epistemologies: how does
pan-Africanist thought condition criteria and principles of identity and citizenship
towards the institutionalization of racialized and pluralistic policies for the Sixth
Region? Paths of self-determination are debated when problematizing the concept
of “diaspora.” Endogenous criteria and principles that condition reparatory
and racialized policies are discussed. Finally, contributions and potential of the
epistemological assumptions afrocentered for International Relations.
Keywords: Race and International Relations. Sixth Region of Africa. African
Diaspora. Self-determination. Identity & Citizenship.
Resumo
Com a Declaração, pela União Africana, da Diáspora como Sexta Região do continente
– reivindicação centenária de ativistas e intelectuais – ressurgem debates ao redor
da identidade africana. Almeja-se explicar via epistemologias africanas: como o
pensamento pan-africanista condicionam critérios e princípios de identidade e
cidadania rumo à institucionalização de políticas racializadas e pluralistas para a
Sexta Região? Debatem-se caminhos de autodeterminação ao problematizarmos o
conceito “diáspora.” Em seguida, são discutidos critérios e princípios endógenos
que condicionam políticas reparatórias e racializadas. Na conclusão, sinalizam-se
contribuições e potencial dos pressupostos epistemológicos afrocentrados para as
Relações Internacionais.
Palavras-chave: Raça & Relações Internacionais. Sexta Região da África. Diáspora
Africana. Autodeterminação. Identidade & Cidadania.
Resumen
Con la Declaración, por la Unión Africana, de la Diáspora como Sexta Región –
reivindicación centenaria de activistas e intelectuales – resurgen debates en torno
a la identidad africana. Se pretende explicar vía epistemologías africanas: ¿cómo
condicionan el pensamiento panafricano criterios y principios de identidad y
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
3-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
ciudadanía rumbo a la institucionalización de políticas racializadas y pluralistas
para la Sexta Región? Se debaten caminos de autodeterminación al problematizar
el concepto “diáspora.” Se discuten los criterios y principios que condicionan las
políticas reparadoras y racializadas. En conclusión, se señalan contribuciones y
potencial de los presupuestos epistemológicos afrocentrados para las Relaciones
Internacionales.
Palabras clave: Raza & Relaciones Internacionales. Sexta Región de África. Diáspora
Africana. Autodeterminación. Identidad & Ciudadanía.
Introduction
When Burkinabé intellectual Ki-Zerbo (2006) was asked what the biggest
problem was for Africa in his book, For When Africa, he replied that it was
the problem of identity. All this because the oppressors have fixed the image
of Africa and Africans “in the scenario of misery, barbarism, irresponsibility
and chaos” (Ki-Zerbo 2010, XXXII). With Du Bois (1925), Hall (1990), Mbembe
(2014), in dialogue with Fanon (2008), taking into account the processes of
enslavement, colonial domination and racism, we would say that African
identity, that is, the identity of African people and their descendants born in
the diaspora, was and continues to be placed in the zone of non-being, that is, it
was and is marked by dehumanization.
Le mouvement panafricaniste au XXe siècle: Contribution to the Conférence
des Intelectuels d’Afrique et de la Diaspora (CIAD I, in free translation: “The
Pan-Africanist Movement in the 20th Century: Contributions to the Conference
of Intellectuals from Africa and the Diaspora”) (Union Africaine 2004), a work
organized by the African Union in partnership with the Republic of Senegal, is
not only full of historical evidence about what the Pan-Africanist movement was
in the 20th century, but also contains reflections that reveal how this movement
was being built, on a global level, as a force for combating racism and for
elaborating African identity beyond national identities.
In the aforementioned work, Le mouvement panafricaniste au XXe
siècle (2004), and in the eight volumes of the General History of Africa,
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
4-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
which were published by the United Nations Educational, Scientiic and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO) between the 1960s and 1990s, one can see
that the concern to forge a Pan-African identity, which takes into account the
particularities of the experiences of being an African person on the continent
and in the African diaspora, is present (Malomalo, 2018, 2019).
However, while the Pan-African Congresses, for example, were considered
spaces for activism, politics and science by blacks in the African diaspora, the
General History of Africa, published by UNESCO, devoted more of its pages
to telling the history of Africans on the continent. In order to correct the
shortcomings that were observed in the preparation of the work considered
to be the realization of epistemic and political justice for Africa, and with an
increasing understanding of the importance of the African diaspora, UNESCO
dedicated the 10th volume to the African diaspora with this title: General
History of Africa, X: Africa and its Diasporas (Santos 2023).
As a strategy for both the fragmentation and obliteration of the global
African community, for centuries any recognition of dignity to African people
was denied, through, not only, de-Africanization processes, but also subjective
legal colonial and slavery instruments. Resulting, partly, from movements that
for centuries have claimed recognition of the cultural and historical continuum
of African resistances and solidarity among target peoples of colonization,
enslavement, and racism, “the diaspora” was institutionalized as the Sixth
Region by the African Union (AU) in 20035. That opened new debates around
the African identity that recover a conceptual repertoire from the rise of
African emancipatory movements that promote re-Africanizations and propose
endogenous solutions based on the heritage of African knowledge and culture.
Our research problem, therefore, aims to explain: how does the pan-Africanist
thought condition criteria and principles of identity and citizenship towards
the institutionalization of racialized and pluralist policies for the Sixth Region?
It is not the objective of this research to present a decisive or final meaning
regarding what African identity is. Instead, it consists of articulating, in debate, a
theoretical-conceptual framework referring to the ontological conceptualization
of the African person in the Sixth Region in the footsteps of Doty (1993) and Silva
5 The original ive regions are: Central Africa, Southern Africa, Southern Africa, West Africa and East Africa.
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
5-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
(2021), as well as its eects on criteria and principles of identity and citizenship
produced endogenously through African epistemologies.
This research is characterized as explanatory since this qualitative
investigation aims to deepen the reasons and paths that lead to the establishment
of African criteria and principles for identity and citizenship, through racialized
and pluralist policies. Considering the theme whose sources of information come
from, mostly, the oral circulation of ideas or institutional means, data collection
through semi-structured interviews and documentary research, in addition
to bibliographical review, were used as procedural methods. Primary sources
consist of interview transcripts, ocial African Union documents, as well as
speeches by activists and intellectuals at congresses.
We dialogue, essentially, with the theoretical keys provided by the critical
approach, in International Relations and related areas, and racist epistemological
assumptions, as explained by Errol Henderson (2013). Thus, our analysis draws
on postcolonial, anticolonial and/or pan-Africanist oral and written texts by
Gonzalez (1988), Doty (1993), Malomalo (2010, 2017, 2018, 2019), Silva (2021, 2022),
and Dagoberto Fonseca (Latitudes Africanas 2022).
Following the introduction, the irst section discusses paths of self-
determination and challenges using the concept of “diaspora” to refer to the
experience of enslavement, colonization and usurpation of African identity. In
the second part, we seek to outline criteria and principles that, based on African
ontologies and epistemologies, shape the endogenous conception of racialized
and pluralistic components of identity and citizenship policies. Finally, we
make final considerations about the contributions presented throughout the
work and the epistemological, theoretical and practical potential research
assumptions for the field of International Relations.
Paths to de-Africanization and self-determination
under debate
This section aims to bring into debate Pan-Africanist intellectual traditions
regarding the processes of de-Africanization and self-determination, racializing
analytical categories that seek to study international relations concerning
African identity in the Sixth Region of the continent based on African
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
6-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
theoretical-epistemological bases. In this context, it is essential to respond to
questions posed by Doty (1993) dialoguing with both African and Brazilian
libraries. Furthermore, we problematize operationalizing the concept of
“diaspora” in the reality of African peoples, presenting additional discovered
paths from such discussion.
Through the most diverse religious rites, bureaucratic-administrative
processes and intersubjective domination, attempts were made to uproot the
African roots of their peoples. The colonial strategies of de-Africanization of
the Amefrican peoples6 are an ongoing fact. Examples include the deletion
of African names and replacement by European names (Lopes 2011), the
dismemberment of families, compulsory conversions to Islam and Christianity
as well as other physical and symbolic mutilations of African cultural
expressions. Due to its size and terrifying meaning, we must also point out the
incessant Western genocide of racialized peoples, especially original peoples,
traditional and peripheral communities in the Améfricas.
Considering this, we observe that the implementation of colorism is one
of the most ingenious practices for promoting discord and disunity among
African peoples. Disputes, conflicts and rivalries between mestizo people
and black people were strategies provoked by colonial whiteness. The process
occurs through the differentiation, categorization and hierarchization of
African people according to skin pigmentation, degree of hair texture and
“blackness”7 of phenotypic traits. According to Nei Lopes (2011, 446-447):
The main strategy of slavery in the Americas was to make the captives forget
their African status as quickly as possible and assume that of “blacks”, a
sign of subalternity, in order to prevent banzo*8 and the desire for rebellion
or light, frequent reactions, although antagonistic.
9
6 Gonzalez (1988, 77) deines “Améfrica” as “an ethnogeographic reference system, it is our creation and that
of our ancestors on the continent where we live, inspired by African models” whose methodological value
lies in the rescue of a speciic unity between African peoples.
7 Historically, the notion of “black” phenotypic traits has been associated with people from the regions of
Angola-Congo, where the largest population contingent of people enslaved and traficked to Brazil comes from.
We recognize the phenotypic diversity of African peoples beyond this territorial portion of the continent.
8 According to Nei Lopes (2011, 181), banzo can be deined as a “psychopathological state, a kind of nostalgia
with deep depression, almost always fatal, into which some enslaved Africans in the Americas fell.”
9 Versão original: “A principal estratégia do escravismo nas Américas era fazer que os cativos esquecessem o mais
rapidamente sua condição de africanos e assumissem a de “negros”, marca de subalternidade, a im de prevenir
o banzo* e o desejo de rebelião ou fuga, reações frequentes, posto que antagônicas. (Lopes 2011, 46-447).”
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
7-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
The domination over African identity is a seminal point whose tactics
represent one of the specificities of colonialism: its deep and rooted penetration
into the subjectivities of African people, beyond the servile labor bond.
(Bernardino-Costa; Grosfoguel 2016, Curtin 2010, Gonzalez 1988, Malomalo
2017). Exterminating and mischaracterizing the marks of Africanization in
slave societies are steps towards dehumanizing African people, who are no
longer recognized as political or epistemic subjects (Silva 2021, 38).
The de-Africanization processes could be summarized in multiple denials,
among which we highlight the denial of existing according to African ways of
being and living. Operant racism is normalized in such a way that the Western
white subject is placed at the center of morality, intellectual productions and
aesthetics (Silva 2021). This subject parametrizes behaviors, cultural icons and
identities by framing what is acceptable as within normality, what is tolerated
through “cordial racism” and what is retaliated, exterminated, or rejected. Still
according to Professor Karine Silva (2021, 47):
Colonizing Eurocentrism denied the existence of non-white peoples in two
ways: it dehumanized the people it racialized, hierarchized and traficked,
placing them in a zone of not being (FANON, 2008); and used all its efforts
to prohibit the creation of States, placing such nations in a condition of
no place. That is, the subjectivity of the ex-colonized was doubly denied,
both in the sphere of being and in that of international power. It is always
worth remembering that only those that are recognized as states can be
considered subjects of Public International Law.
10
In the Pan-Africanist perception, one of the clear impediments to the
processes of a greater union, unity and cooperation between African peoples in
the Pan-Africanist perception is the colonial capacity to manipulate the memory
and forgetfulness of African people regarding their own identity. As a result of
constant resistance to racism, the Pan-Africanist movement emerged claiming
the self-determination of African peoples. (Gonzalez 1988).
10 Versão original: “O eurocentrismo colonizador negou a existência dos povos não brancos de duas
maneiras: desumanizou as pessoas que racializou, hierarquizou e traicou colocando-as na zona de não ser
(Fanon, 2008); e empregou todos os seus esforços para proibir a criação de Estados, colocando tais nações na
condição de não lugar. Ou seja, a subjetividade dos ex-colonizados foi negada duplamente, tanto na esfera do
ser como na do poder internacional. Não é demais lembrar que apenas os que são reconhecidos como Estados
podem ser considerados sujeitos de Direito Internacional Público. (Silva 2021, 47)”
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
8-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
Fundamentally, in this research, we aim to make the questions posed
by Roxanne Doty (1993, 444) regarding African experiences, demands and
productions in the Améfricas. We rely on questions such as: Who are “we”?
Who are “they”? To whom we relate? How do “we” relate to “them”?
The invention of racially based hierarchies rests on the view that
race is a biological component of human beings. We must recognize in the
invisibilization of the race category and the autonomous agency of an African
subject the very strategy of denying citizenship to a Brazilian identity already
composed of African presence, even if refuted by dominant eugenics groups.
Hence the importance of conceptualizing race according to Doty (1993). The
place of the category “race” in international relations studies has, only recently,
incorporated a legacy of registered and systematized knowledge since at least
the 19th century. However, according to Doty (1993, 450), the academic traditions
of the field of international relations are still anchored in biological dierences.
In the literature on Education for Ethnic-Racial Relations (ERER) and in
African Studies, for example, the concept of race as a sociological category – as
opposed to a biological category – is consolidated in many countries, such as
Brazil. Despite the eugenic categorization of humanity by biological criteria,
Nascimento (2009 186) exposes that W.E.B. du Bois “locates the shared identity of
African peoples on the continent and in the diaspora in their common historical
and cultural experience rather than in biological criteria.”
The contradiction resides in the attempt to make “race” seem neutral when,
in fact, it is a category inherently linked to practices of exclusion and power. That
is, according to Doty (1993, 449) “the problem is in the concept itself and in how
it is generally defined and applied.” Her conceptualization of “race” deals more
with a critical genealogy of the points where racial dierences were constructed
than with the historical importance of race in international relations. Through
the generation of discursive practices, practices of meaning and the repetition
of these practices in everyday life engrains racialization in society, which is
a dynamic process that enables a social group to be repeatedly defined and
delimited. According to Silva (2021, 39), in addition to “the silencing of memories,
one of the epistemic inflicted violences is discursive disauthorization.” In this
sense, “race” not only crosses borders, but becomes a place where borders are
produced.
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
9-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
Doty’s invitation to reconceptualize is reflected in the data collection carried
out by the co-authors with professors Dagoberto José Fonseca (Unesp), Jorge
Rasta (Quilombo D’Oiti) and Bas’Ilele Malomalo (UNILAB), with the mediation
of professor Sylvani Euclênio (Thinking Africanly – PA). The conversation
sought to collect information linked to academic reflections, knowledge and
experiences of the guests, varied work profiles and theoretical aliations
within the Pan-Africanist field.
The semi-structured interview, broadcast live and available on YouTube
channels (Latitudes Africanas 2022), was strongly motivated by the re-
emergence of debates around African identity and presence in the so-called
“diaspora.” In exact reproduction of the words of the Rasta master:
We keep looking for the threads that lead us to Africa and the condition
in which we ind ourselves. Because it is very dificult to ind yourself
in a position of African and diaspora or African, despite such being the
concept of the 6th Region, in a world, a society that says that being black is
the worst thing. It is the lower limit of a being; it is to be of African descent
in Brazil, which places us mainly as a descendant of enslaved people, or
of a slave, as literature teaches.
11
As for Dagoberto Fonseca’s views (Latitudes Africanas 2022), the
theoretical-analytical foundation allows us to advance in reconceptualization
studies considering that, for him, the “appropriation of the concept (...) it is
fundamental for us to change identity. A concept is not an empty space; it is,
instead, fundamental because it is not neutral, it is political.”
We observed the emergence of many questions and proposals to revise
the concept of “diaspora” as a topic of interest in the field of Social Sciences
in the first quarter of the 21st century (Edwards 2017, Flor 2019, Malomalo,
2017, 2019). Both in the scope of academic discussion and in that of activism,
and the dialogue between both, there are multiple sources of criticism of the
term diaspora, despite not being the only target concept. Terms like “negro”,
11 Versão original: “A gente vai buscando os ilamentos que nos levam à África e à condição em que nos
encontramos. Porque é muito diícil se encontrar numa posição de africano e diáspora ou africano, mesmo
sendo o conceito da 6ª Região, em um mundo, uma sociedade que diz que ser preto é a pior coisa. É o limite
inferior de um ser, é ser descendente de africano no Brasil, que nos coloca principalmente como descendente
de escravizados, ou de escravo, como a literatura ensina.” (Latitudes Africanas 2022).
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
10-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
“preto”, “Afro-descendant”, “Afro-Brazilian” and many others according to Flor
(2019, 376) also “connote, at the same time, the core of disagreements and the
motto of these disputes.” Therefore, we focus on the “African diaspora” due to
its internationalized institutional dimension within the scope of the African
Union, a field of interest for this research.
A break in the history of relations between Africa and its diasporas marks
2001, given that such year encompasses the transition from the Organization
of African Unity (OAU), founded in 1963, to the African Union (AU) (União
Africana 2000, 2003), which represents a new spirit of African insertion in the
new post-1990 world order.
Through the creation of the “Diaspora Program”, the AU aims to mobilize
hundreds of millions of people not only from recent migrations, but also who
have been in a condition of mobility since before or during the European
colonial enterprise. Aer the declaration of the Diaspora as the Sixth Region
of the continent (African Union 2003), technical meetings were organized
to define the concept. The result is to understand the “African diaspora” as
“composed of people of African origin living outside the continent, regardless
of their citizenship or nationality and who are willing to contribute to the
development of the continent and to the construction of the African Union”
(African Union 2005, União Africana 2005).
According to Edwards (2017, 40), the term “diaspora” corresponds to
“[one] of the most embarrassing problems in recent works on black culture
and politics in the international sphere.” One of the most striking criticisms
focuses on the “splitting of the world into two parts by colonial whiteness: on
one hand, there is a humanity entitled to a dignified life and, on the other, a sub-
humanity, a place where lives do not matter – they are silenceable, exploitable,
and disposable.” (Silva 2021, 42). Their perceptions gain more dimensions with
the provocations of Dagoberto Fonseca (Latitudes Africanas 2022) in relation
to the operationalization of the term “diaspora” on African peoples:
(...) the concept of diaspora does indeed create some problems for us. We
have some diasporas: the Jewish diaspora, (in)the gypsy diaspora and
many smaller ones (...) What are these diasporas saying to us, as a concept?
They’re telling us these are smaller people. By the way, non-people. That
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
11-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
were separated, that were dispersed, that were violated throughout history
and lost their original territories so that today they live in the diaspora.12
In order to analyze its assumptions, the semantic links that dehumanize
peoples, particularly Africans, were investigated when juxtaposed with the
term “diaspora”, to which the following questions are appropriate:
Is this situation applicable to the African continent? Does this concept
apply to us? If we consider that it applies to us, why doesn’t this concept
it the Irish, the Scots, the Britons, why they do not it the Italians, the
Germans, why do these concepts not belong to the Japanese… but why do
these concepts belong to us? (...)
Brazil is the largest country of Italian refugees since the 19th century and
we still call them immigrants, when strictly speaking they are refugees.
Refugees from the wars of uniication in Italy, refugees from the wars of
uniication in Germany, refugees from the Napoleonic wars in the context
of the European 19
th
century.
But we don’t call these populations that lived the diaspora, let alone
conceptualize these refugee populations either. Especially because refugees
are those from Eastern Europe, those from Africa; refugees are from other
countries, but not from (Western) Europe. (Latitudes Africanas 2022).
13
Therefore, it seems essential to deepen – in the wake of Doty’s argument
– the conditions in which the term proves to be appropriate in a very brief
genealogy. Fonseca’s primary argument (PA, 2022) presents as a reflection
12 Versão original: “(...) o conceito de diáspora nos cria de fato alguns problemas. Nós temos algumas diásporas:
a diáspora judaica, (n)a diáspora cigana e tantas outras menores (...) O que essas diásporas estão dizendo para
nós, enquanto conceito? Estão dizendo pra nós que essas são pessoas menores. Aliás, não-pessoas. Que foram
separadas, que foram dispersadas, que foram violentadas ao longo da história e perderam seus territórios
originários de modo que hoje vivem na diáspora.”
13 Versão original: “Essa situação se aplica ao continente africano? Esse conceito se aplica a nós? Se
considerarmos que se aplica a nós, por que esse conceito não cabe aos irlandeses, por que esse conceito não
cabe aos escoceses, por que esses conceitos não cabem aos bretões, por que esses conceitos não cabem aos
italianos, por que esses conceitos não cabem aos alemães, por que esses conceitos não cabem aos japoneses…
mas por que esses conceitos cabem a nós? (...) O Brasil é o maior país de refugiados italianos desde o século
XIX e nós ainda os chamamos de imigrantes, quando a rigor são refugiados. Refugiados das guerras de
uniicação na Itália, refugiados das guerras de uniicação na Alemanha, refugiados das guerras napoleônicas
no contexto do século XIX europeu. Mas nós não chamamos essas populações que viveram a diáspora,
então tampouco conceituamos essas populações de refugiadas. Até porque, refugiados são aqueles do Leste
Europeu, são os da África, refugiados são de outros países, mas não da Europa chamada assim de Ocidental.”
(Latitudes Africanas 2022).
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
12-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
of the mobilization of racial hierarchies invented by whiteness to define who
migrates, in humane conditions, and those who suer diaspora, migrating as
objects of other peoples.
Moreover, given the etymology of the term “diaspora” as a Greek word
that refers to “dispersion”, he argues that the “notion of a ‘dispersed flower’
conveys that we have no roots and this is fundamental” to be said because it is in
disagreement with the reality of the peoples in the Sixth Region. For Malomalo
(Latitudes Africanas 2022), the fact that this dispersion led people to find new
colonies would be consistent with the practical process of building the recently
institutionalized African region.
The recent use of the term “diaspora” as a concept, beyond merely a notion,
deserves some attention. Flor (2019, 375) states that, although the notion of
what we now understand as “African diaspora” was current in resistance
against colonialism and slavery, it is relatively consensual in black intellectual
traditions that only in the 1950s did the word become popular, “being granted
the status of a concept.” Only since then has the term “diaspora” been preferred
to evoke “the connections and commonalities between groups of African
descent around the world” (Edwards 2017, 41).
The Stateunion Protestant context was perhaps the main responsible for
the link between the terms “diaspora” and “African” and similar terms, as well
as for the propagation and diusion of this chain of linguistic signs. Initially,
there was an explicit religious foundation for the use of “diaspora” associated
with “[Judeo-Christian] religious semiotics and [the] parallel with the history
of the Hebrew people.” The parallels between the migratory experiences of
African peoples and those of the Jews were based on biblical text. According to
Flor (2019, 378), the “Old Testament thus becomes a fertile ground for analogies
about freedom, exile, exodus and redemption between the history of enslaved
blacks in the New World and that of the Hebrew people.”
Within the scope of emancipatory movements, this association was
possible due to the yearning for a physical and spiritual return to the continent,
from which an imaginary about the identity of African people was built through
the transplanted Jewish experience.
At the dawn of the Pan-Africanist movement, “turning to Africa” was
equivalent to a dream of physical displacement to the original, mythical and
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
13-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
mystical land. (Gala 2019, 85-87) with the purpose of “redemption of the soul”
following the pattern of the Jewish diaspora. However, between the end of the
1970s and the 1980s, another identity linkage with African roots takes shape.
In Flor (2019, 380) we speak of a perceptive transition “from a conception of
genealogical aliation (religious) to a secular conception of belonging (racial).”
We should also be aware that this foundation was oen “conditioned by
an inflexible Stateunion exceptionalism” that does not nullify the advances of
emancipatory movements, but must be debated (Edwards 2017, 47). According to
Gonzalez (1988, 72), there is a fundamental distinction between open racism and
disguised racism or denial. The first is typical of the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic
and Dutch world and guided by the “rule of the single drop of blood” that led
to racial segregation as a device to assert racial superiority. The second is
characteristic of the Amefrican territory where “‘theories’ of miscegenation,
assimilation and ‘racial democracy’ prevail.”
For the Stateunion intellectual Lélia Gonzalez (1988, 74), it is precisely the
racial conscience in relation to racism that gives rise to unity, “in the sense of
rescuing and arming the humanity and competence of an entire ethnic group
considered ‘inferior’.” Techniques and characteristics of disguised racism
cloud collective awareness of its practices and eects. Even so, the notion of
“diaspora” gains strength and meaning in scientific and activist discourse in
Brazil “due to the need for new ways of thinking about the relationship between
national society and the African presence (with regard to cultural and political
issues).” (Flor 2019, 374).
Aer all, in line with Doty (1993), we seek to answer: what elements help
us define what it means to be an African person in the Sixth Region? Given the
ethnic and national plurality in the identity composition, it seems pertinent
to assume that the answer involves speaking not in terms of “Afro-Brazilian
people” or “Afro-diasporic people”, but rather in terms of “Africans from the
Sixth Region”, with the necessary national derivations, forming the “African-
Brazilian” identities, the “African-Argentinean” and so on. The results of the
primary data collection allow us, in the expression of Dagoberto (2022), to
translate Pan-Africanist claims to epistemological endogeneity:
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
14-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
(...) So I “I’m” claiming that we review our concepts in the light of a historical,
ontological and cultural experience. (...) The concept is political and cultural
because it also has an ontological basis and foundation in what we are
and what we want to be. It is not, therefore, another one who deines
who I am based on the agreements that this other says I am. (Latitudes
Africanas 2022).
14
In Flor’s review (2019, 374), a broad understanding of the state of the art
of Pan-Africanist movements suggests that we are experiencing the “rise of
new forms of belonging/identification, propagated through transnational
movements of (re)construction of bonds with Africa.” The researcher identifies
that systematically questioning the erasure of the African presence is at the
origin of these “new patterns of identity, culture and belonging.”
Therefore, our central point of discussion regarding the self-determination
of African identity in the Sixth Region grows in obstacles from the premises
of cultural and political unity. That is, although there is African resistance to
slavery, colonization, and racism, unity is more dicult in a context where
categorizations based on colorism were promoted and where racial segregation
was not explicitly implemented, despite this being visible to the naked eye. In
the following section, we will address criteria and principles of identity and
citizenship based on African ontologies and epistemologies, in addition to
their concrete and potential reverberations on racialized policies in the
international sphere.
Principles and criteria of African identity and citizenship:
racialized and pluralist policies
The afirmation of our African origin does not imply any rejection of
our Brazilian national identity, for the simple reason that the Brazilian
national identity is also African. (...) the dominant segment refuses to
assume its own face. (...) They speak of ‘reminiscence’ or the ‘survival of
14 Versão original: “(...) Então eu “tô” reivindicamos que nós revisemos os nossos conceitos à luz de uma
experiência histórica e ontológica e cultural. (...) O conceito é político e cultural porque ele também tem base
e fundamentação ontológica naquilo que somos e naquilo que queremos ser. Não é, portanto, um outro que
deine quem eu sou a partir de concertações que esse outro diz que sou.” (Latitudes Africanas, 2022).
Bas’Ilele Malomalo; Lúcia de Toledo França Bueno; Marrielle Maia
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
15-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
traces’ of an African culture supposedly alien to the Brazilian one... Such
euphemisms cannot cover the sun with a sieve. The truth is that deep
and broad African dimensions permeate our culture and our history
and constitute the integral deining basis of Brazilian national identity.
Senator Abdias Nascimento in his inaugural speech at the Federal Senate
(Nascimento 1997 quoted by Gala 2019, 321-322).
15
Under the title “Africa: the root of Brazil”, the above words reflect the
fight against racism in national legal and political institutions that erodes the
resistance, self-determination and self-government of the African-Brazilian
people.
In this section, we outline how agents guided by African ontologies and
epistemologies, in response to the colonial concession of sub-citizenships, shape
the endogenous conception of principles, criteria and racialized policies of
identity and citizenship as part of a path of self-determination and armation
of the African presence in the Sixth Region.
Rescuing the assiduous pulsão palmarina16 encompasses demarcating
the centrality of cultural awareness for Africans, considering the location of
a person as the “psychological, cultural, historical or individual place” that
they occupy in relation to their own culture, history and African heritage.
Therefore, policies euphemistically referred to as “assimilationist” naturalize
a white European core of the human experience, marginalize African peoples
and obliterate “their presence, their meaning, their activities and their [African]
image.” In contrast, for Asante, Afrocentricity “is a type of thinking, practice
and perspective that perceives Africans as subjects and agents of phenomena
acting on their own cultural image and human interests.” (Asante 2009, 93).
Queiroz (2017), Malomalo (2010), Gala (2019) and Abdias in the 1997
inaugural speech converge in the argument that the persistent denial of
15 Versão original: “’A airmação da nossa origem africana não implica nenhuma rejeição à nossa identidade
nacional brasileira, pela simples razão de que a identidade nacional brasileira também é africana. (...) o
segmento dominante se recusa a assumir sua própria face. (...) Falam de 'reminiscência' ou da ‘sobrevivência
de traços’ de uma cultura africana supostamente alheia à brasileira… Tais eufemismos não conseguem tapar
o sol com a peneira. A verdade é que profundas e amplas dimensões africanas permeiam a nossa cultura e
a nossa história e constituem a base integral deinidora da identidade nacional brasileira.’ Senador Abdias
Nascimento em discurso de posse no Senado Federal “. (Nascimento 1997 citado por Gala 2019, 321-322).
16 Reference to the legacy of Quilombo dos Palmares.
What does it mean to be an African person? Racialized identity and citizenship policies for the Sixth Region of Africa
Rev. Carta Inter., Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 3, e1352, 2023
16-27
OSSIÊD
Relações Internacionais:
da América Latina para o mundo
citizenship, whether passive or active, only on the text in law or in full ecacy,
supports the invisibilization of African identity(ies) as a project.
According to Doty (1993, 459), since racial relations are global and vice
versa, racial identity becomes an important element in the construction of
national identity. At the end of the 19th century, disputes around Brazilian
identity and the implementation of eugenic projects intensiied. The
reformulation of afirmative policies for white people concomitant with
the genocide of the African-Brazilian people, however, have not been able
to materialize in Brazil the plan to eradicate the high African demographic
presence and its cultural manifestations.
Queiroz (2017, 125) states that the citizenship denial to enslaved Africans
was “based on the fear of past experiences, such as the Haitian one”, namely
the Haitian Revolution. According to the author (2017, 98), it was through the
feeling of fear that the phenomenon of Haitian Revolution would be reproduced
in Brazil that the white society “(...) developed practices, national narratives,
founding myths and discourses that build excluding social structures.”
For Lélia, “in the face of resistance from the colonized, violence will assume
new and more sophisticated contours; sometimes not seemingly violence,
but “true superiority.” The historical-cultural formation of the Améfricas
reverberates the experience that the Portuguese and Spanish had developed in
terms of “more eective processes of articulating racial relations”, especially
aer the Moorish (African and black) conquered Iberia. (Gonzalez 1988, 71).
It seems opportune to relect on the sophistication of these colonial
domination mechanisms in direct dialogue with Doty (1993, 460) as she claims
that the presuppositions of racism would not be based on inferiority, but
on the relationship between the “insiders” and the “insiders.” That is, her
approach relates to the normalization of an identity model and the retaliation,
rejection, marginalization and obliteration of the person who deviates from
the invented norm.
Doty’s text (1993, 457) is indicative in proposing that such discursive
practices be examined in specific historical instances of imperial expansion
in order to analyze how questions of identity and dierence, “self” and “other”
were articulated. Denying citizenship or granting of nationality, in the sense
presented by Roxanne, would correspond to the abnormalization of the African